<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for TechJolt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techjolt.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techjolt.net</link>
	<description>A little bit of everything tech-related</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:07:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Voice for iPhone is Here by Tweets that mention Google Voice for iPhone is Here -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2010/01/google-voice-for-iphone-is-here/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Google Voice for iPhone is Here -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 05:07:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=213#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jonathan, TechJolt. TechJolt said: Google Voice for iPhone is finally here! No joke - it&#039;s an HTML5 app, and it&#039;s very nice. http://bit.ly/ddUDdo [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jonathan, TechJolt. TechJolt said: Google Voice for iPhone is finally here! No joke &#8211; it&#39;s an HTML5 app, and it&#39;s very nice. <a href="http://bit.ly/ddUDdo" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ddUDdo</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Google Wave by Ryan Fry</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2009/11/google-wave-2/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=183#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had performance issues on Wave, though I&#039;m very sure it&#039;s my internet connection. At home, editing any sort of wave is a big problem because everything has a several second delay on it. At school however, our PC&#039;s and Mac&#039;s, though much weaker then my computer, can easily skim through a 100+ blip Wave in a few seconds. Hopefully they get this kind of stuff fixed, or begin adding speed changes, like being able to turn off high-bandwidth things that kill my wifi.
On the topic of interesting things to do with Wave, try getting a few people together and play some Monopoly. Me and 2 of my friends have a pretty heated Monopoly game going, and we also use Wave to manage fundraising for our Robotics team. It&#039;s an awesome tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had performance issues on Wave, though I&#8217;m very sure it&#8217;s my internet connection. At home, editing any sort of wave is a big problem because everything has a several second delay on it. At school however, our PC&#8217;s and Mac&#8217;s, though much weaker then my computer, can easily skim through a 100+ blip Wave in a few seconds. Hopefully they get this kind of stuff fixed, or begin adding speed changes, like being able to turn off high-bandwidth things that kill my wifi.<br />
On the topic of interesting things to do with Wave, try getting a few people together and play some Monopoly. Me and 2 of my friends have a pretty heated Monopoly game going, and we also use Wave to manage fundraising for our Robotics team. It&#8217;s an awesome tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on VMware Fusion 2 and Snow Leopard &#8211; Better? by Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2009/08/vmware-fusion-2-and-snow-leopard-better/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=157#comment-70</guid>
		<description>Go for it. I love Parallels over VMWare and haven&#039;t switched back. Looking to see how it runs on Snow Leopard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go for it. I love Parallels over VMWare and haven&#8217;t switched back. Looking to see how it runs on Snow Leopard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SUSE Studio Review by Novell News Summary &#8211; Part II: SUSE Studio, IDC, and Inland Revenue (NZ) &#124; Boycott Novell</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2009/08/suse-studio-review/comment-page-1/#comment-67</link>
		<dc:creator>Novell News Summary &#8211; Part II: SUSE Studio, IDC, and Inland Revenue (NZ) &#124; Boycott Novell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:52:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=138#comment-67</guid>
		<description>[...] is another new review and two more that are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is another new review and two more that are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fedora 10 Set to be Released Today by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2008/11/fedora-10-set-to-be-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 17:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=49#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately Apple won&#039;t create a Linux version of iTunes, so it can&#039;t run on it natively.  The only thing I know of is to install Windows inside a VM using either VMware or Virtualbox and run iTunes there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately Apple won&#8217;t create a Linux version of iTunes, so it can&#8217;t run on it natively.  The only thing I know of is to install Windows inside a VM using either VMware or Virtualbox and run iTunes there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fedora 10 Set to be Released Today by snake</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2008/11/fedora-10-set-to-be-released-today/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>snake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 19:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=49#comment-23</guid>
		<description>I have a question I have Fedora 10 on my hp laptop can you install itunes on it  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a question I have Fedora 10 on my hp laptop can you install itunes on it  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Things Linux Does Better Than OS X by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2008/12/10-things-linux-does-better-than-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 18:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=54#comment-16</guid>
		<description>Ok, I finally read it all.  The argument about the menus is that it is easier to &#039;throw&#039; the mouse at the top left of your screen rather than target a small area at the top of the app window.  On a display with a low enough resolution (1280x1024 max) that may be practical.  That is what I have at work.  At home, however, I have a widescreen that does 1680x1050.  Not much more vertical space, but a lot more horizontal.  If I have an app at the lower right area of my display, it&#039;s a long way to the top left corner to use that app&#039;s menu.  I&#039;d rather keep my mouse near the app itself as I tend to &#039;look&#039; with my mouse, especially when I&#039;m reading.

Again, this is all my preference.  I still wouldn&#039;t mind having a Mac and being forced to go all the way to the top of the screen. :)

One thing I found humorous was this statement:
&lt;em&gt;If it took an interface nerd like me two weeks to notice this &lt;/em&gt;(speaking of Outlook using Word as it&#039;s mail writer) &lt;em&gt;imagine how blurry the distinction is to normal people.&lt;/em&gt;

All jokes aside, I&#039;m not normal.. But the first time I ever used MS Office and Outlook, I noticed this the very first time I ever composed an email and looked for a way to turn it off.  So while what this guy says may apply to most &#039;normal&#039; computer users, that statement alone nullifies anything he says for my own personal use.

Give me something I can customize to my own taste and usefulness.  Even Linux isn&#039;t &#039;everything&#039; to me in that regard, but it&#039;s the closest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I finally read it all.  The argument about the menus is that it is easier to &#8216;throw&#8217; the mouse at the top left of your screen rather than target a small area at the top of the app window.  On a display with a low enough resolution (1280&#215;1024 max) that may be practical.  That is what I have at work.  At home, however, I have a widescreen that does 1680&#215;1050.  Not much more vertical space, but a lot more horizontal.  If I have an app at the lower right area of my display, it&#8217;s a long way to the top left corner to use that app&#8217;s menu.  I&#8217;d rather keep my mouse near the app itself as I tend to &#8216;look&#8217; with my mouse, especially when I&#8217;m reading.</p>
<p>Again, this is all my preference.  I still wouldn&#8217;t mind having a Mac and being forced to go all the way to the top of the screen. <img src='http://www.techjolt.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>One thing I found humorous was this statement:<br />
<em>If it took an interface nerd like me two weeks to notice this </em>(speaking of Outlook using Word as it&#8217;s mail writer) <em>imagine how blurry the distinction is to normal people.</em></p>
<p>All jokes aside, I&#8217;m not normal.. But the first time I ever used MS Office and Outlook, I noticed this the very first time I ever composed an email and looked for a way to turn it off.  So while what this guy says may apply to most &#8216;normal&#8217; computer users, that statement alone nullifies anything he says for my own personal use.</p>
<p>Give me something I can customize to my own taste and usefulness.  Even Linux isn&#8217;t &#8216;everything&#8217; to me in that regard, but it&#8217;s the closest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Things Linux Does Better Than OS X by Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2008/12/10-things-linux-does-better-than-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:58:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=54#comment-15</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s so long because he thoroughly explains &quot;the basic premise&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s so long because he thoroughly explains &#8220;the basic premise&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Things Linux Does Better Than OS X by Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2008/12/10-things-linux-does-better-than-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=54#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Yes, that&#039;s long.  I&#039;ve actually (tried to) read it before.  I think I understand the basic premise though (though I&#039;m not sure).  It may just be that I don&#039;t fall in line with Apple&#039;s overall &#039;philosophy&#039; or whatever you want to call it.

As far as apps having their own menu, to me it&#039;s a matter of practicality.  I normally have several windows/apps open at once, scattered all over the screen.  If my app&#039;s title bar isn&#039;t near the top of the screen, I hate having to move my mouse all the way to the top of the screen to access the menu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s long.  I&#8217;ve actually (tried to) read it before.  I think I understand the basic premise though (though I&#8217;m not sure).  It may just be that I don&#8217;t fall in line with Apple&#8217;s overall &#8216;philosophy&#8217; or whatever you want to call it.</p>
<p>As far as apps having their own menu, to me it&#8217;s a matter of practicality.  I normally have several windows/apps open at once, scattered all over the screen.  If my app&#8217;s title bar isn&#8217;t near the top of the screen, I hate having to move my mouse all the way to the top of the screen to access the menu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 10 Things Linux Does Better Than OS X by Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.techjolt.net/2008/12/10-things-linux-does-better-than-os-x/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 17:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techjolt.net/?p=54#comment-12</guid>
		<description>I know it&#039;s a bit long, but &lt;a href=&quot;http://daringfireball.net/2003/05/the_problems_with_clickthrough&quot; title=&quot;DF article&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;read this&lt;/a&gt; and tell me what you think about each app having it&#039;s own menu.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know it&#8217;s a bit long, but <a href="http://daringfireball.net/2003/05/the_problems_with_clickthrough" title="DF article" rel="nofollow">read this</a> and tell me what you think about each app having it&#8217;s own menu.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
